[Development] Namespace macros for Qt Add-Ons
thiago.macieira at intel.com
Fri Dec 9 13:32:27 CET 2011
On Friday, 9 de December de 2011 08.50.41, lars.knoll at nokia.com wrote:
> >Now we have macros like:
> >So it's not consistent at the moment, which makes the macros
> >non-guessable. What would be the right thing to do here?
> I'm not a too big fan of these macros. The main question is whether they
> are needed at all.
They are probably a heritage of the Qt Mobility namespace, which existed in
the first place because the modules there were meant to be moved into Qt and
the namespace dropped, keeping source compatibility.
Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com
Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center
Intel Sweden AB - Registration Number: 556189-6027
Knarrarnäsgatan 15, 164 40 Kista, Stockholm, Sweden
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 190 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
Url : http://lists.qt-project.org/pipermail/development/attachments/20111209/b4b6ef33/attachment.bin
More information about the Development