[Development] Fixing the DLL/shared/static mess
Uwe.Rathmann at tigertal.de
Sat Apr 14 10:09:56 CEST 2012
On 04/13/2012 06:41 PM, Thiago Macieira wrote:
> Therefore, *ALL* Qt libraries must be either static or shared. Mixed
> builds will not be supported
Maybe this is a silly question, but what makes a library to be a Qt
Or asking the other way round: what is the difference between a module
like QtSvg and 3rd party libraries like Qwt or Qxt - beside where they
are hosted ?
As far as I understand one of the ideas behind the modularization is to
develop modules more independent, what makes these modules sooner or
later very similar to 3rd party libraries.
More information about the Development