[Development] Why we *have to* remove codecFor... ?
loaden at gmail.com
Sun Apr 22 12:50:56 CEST 2012
> (I don't have any clue about MSVC).
That the point! In current solution, It's does't work for this case if use
Please don't think about of MSVC users.
Or, please give me a way to fix the problem.
2012/4/22 Giuseppe D'Angelo <dangelog at gmail.com>
> You can do that -- as I said in my link, that requires that the
> compiler emits UTF-8 as the execution charset for that literal. gcc
> simply leaves the source bytes untrasformed if you don't pass the
> various -fexec-charset options, so all it's required is that your
> source code is encoded using UTF8-8. (I don't have any clue about
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Development