[Development] Why we *have to* remove codecFor... ?
dbzhang800 at gmail.com
Mon Apr 23 03:11:54 CEST 2012
Thiago Macieira has already answered your question. ;-)
On Sun, Apr 22, 2012 at 6:00 PM, Loaden <loaden at gmail.com> wrote:
>> Seems you still use two different sets of source code.
> The current question is: Shall we need or no-need to use UTF-8 encoding as
> I thought we should use UTF-8 as default, Because it's the better way for
> What do you think?
> Has anyone working for this?
More information about the Development