[Development] Approver status
andre at familiesomers.nl
Fri May 25 11:58:26 CEST 2012
Op 25-5-2012 11:53, Sylvain Pointeau schreef:
> On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 10:55 AM, Laszlo Papp <lpapp at kde.org
> <mailto:lpapp at kde.org>> wrote:
> > I think that defining fixed number of LOC or hours spend on
> > the project is not going to work. Please don't go there.
> I fully agree. I can understand the other Andre's point as well, but I
> think those are really not too helpful measurements to introduce
> Why not using the priority of (number of) bugs solved?
No, the question should be the other way around: why use that? How is
that a measure for how fit a person is to take the role of Approver? Do
you have any data that supports the notion that someone fixing a number
of high priority bugs is a more qualified person to fill the role of
Approver than somebody else who has done significant contributions to
Please don't just suggest _other_ random measures one might use, but
first considder what such a measure actually measures, and if that
really is related to the question at hand: does a person most likely
make a good Approver?
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Development