[Development] Approver status
Sven.Anderson at snom.com
Fri May 25 11:59:40 CEST 2012
On 25.05.2012 09:34, André Somers wrote:
> Bottom line: let's not introduce rules that are supposed to solve
> problems that have not occured, and that are likely to cause more
> problems than they might ever prevent occuring in the first place. I
> would like to stimulate people to make the most of the current set of
> rules: if you have a doubt about an approver nomination, just voice it.
I also don't think fixed numbers in rules are very wise. What about
offering some moving average stats of various metrics somewhere (maybe
they already exist?) and just referring to them in the rules as a guide
line? That's more dynamic and adapts to the different activity levels
over modules and time.
More information about the Development