[Development] Request moving project to playground area

Hamed Masafi hamed.masafi at gmail.com
Sat Feb 4 08:05:41 CET 2017


Why not using Q_PROPERTY instead of NUT_DECLARE_FIELD?

A property im table is more thsn a just Qt property, that macro create
property and static field for query writing and class info about property
to add to database.

And what's the reason to have a constructor as Q_INVOKABLE?

Andre right about that,

Actually, there are more ORM solutions for Qt, e.g. QxOrm and QDjango

Yes, there are, either other languages/frameworks like .net and java has.
But I really live Qt so I think it can be a good idea if prepare free one
of them to integrate into Qt.

I think Nut is easy to use and feature rich (in alpha state for now) that
support much database manager.

Some of them are complicated and some others are so simple to real using.
We can provide a full feature module with LGPL to community use.

Excuses for my bad English, but I want give that tool to Qt community that
very helped me. I want suggest two of my libraries to playground area.

After all of this, can I know your idea about an orm in playground area?
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.qt-project.org/pipermail/development/attachments/20170204/750f71ab/attachment.html>


More information about the Development mailing list