[Development] Nominate Mike Krus as approver

Lars Knoll lars.knoll at qt.io
Tue Feb 7 10:23:27 CET 2017

On 06 Feb 2017, at 19:27, Thiago Macieira <thiago.macieira at intel.com<mailto:thiago.macieira at intel.com>> wrote:

On segunda-feira, 6 de fevereiro de 2017 18:39:19 PST Oswald Buddenhagen
On Mon, Feb 06, 2017 at 02:54:53PM +0000, Alexander Blasche wrote:
There were no objections and maintainer of a module implies approver, so
could somebody do the honours and grant Mike the rights please? The
necessary period has long since passed.

I am sorry but being the maintainer does not imply approver rights. At
most it implies approver rights for the component he is maintainer for. I
agree that when you maintain a cross module component that this is
somewhat harder to manage.
selective approver rights are not implementable for a horizontal
responsibility, so this is kind of moot.

In any case I am sure that waiting for the required time does not make
much of a difference. Then this discussion is over anyway.
the previous thread already used the word approver without futher
and nobody objected, so i just gave mike the rights.

Let's not quabble over this.

Becoming maintainer of anything in a main module implies becoming Approver
everywhere, if one is not so yet.

Restricted maintainership rights should be used only for playground things.

+1. Being maintainer of something that is part of Qt does of course imply approver rights.


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.qt-project.org/pipermail/development/attachments/20170207/3bd29c15/attachment-0001.html>

More information about the Development mailing list