<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
</head>
<body dir="auto">
Hi,
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Integrity (ghs) is checked during the qt5 build.</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Vxworks is the only target I can think of that is not CI tested. But iirc that’s a gcc flavor.</div>
<div><br>
<div id="AppleMailSignature">Simon</div>
<div><br>
On 11. Oct 2017, at 20:49, Thiago Macieira <<a href="mailto:thiago.macieira@intel.com">thiago.macieira@intel.com</a>> wrote:<br>
<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite">
<div><span>Are there any supported platforms that we do not test in the CI? Probably
</span><br>
<span>INTEGRITY?</span><br>
<span></span><br>
<span>I'm asking based on this outcome from QtCS:</span><br>
<span></span><br>
<blockquote type="cite"><span>We will not add compilers that are worse than what we have today.</span><br>
</blockquote>
<span></span><br>
<span>Right now, Qt 5.10 has a configure-time warning if we don't find C++11 <random>.
</span><br>
<span>I'd like to make that an error and for that I've just pushed a change that </span>
<br>
<span>makes it so.</span><br>
<span></span><br>
<span>So the question is: are there any platforms that could break even after </span>
<br>
<span>passing the CI check?</span><br>
<span>-- </span><br>
<span>Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) <a href="http://intel.com">intel.com</a></span><br>
<span> Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center</span><br>
<span></span><br>
<span>_______________________________________________</span><br>
<span>Development mailing list</span><br>
<span><a href="mailto:Development@qt-project.org">Development@qt-project.org</a></span><br>
<span><a href="http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development">http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development</a></span><br>
</div>
</blockquote>
</div>
</body>
</html>