[Interest] Why QString and not std::string?
rui.maciel at gmail.com
Fri Jun 15 16:39:06 CEST 2012
On 06/15/2012 03:13 PM, Giuseppe D'Angelo wrote:
>> > But it's standard and it is C++.
> But (I think) the point was: what should have we used for the last
> 10-15 years of QString?
I could've been a bit clearer in my initial post, but I intended to know
if there was currently any reason that justified having QString around
instead of simply using what's already included in C++'s standard library.
More information about the Interest