[Interest] Why QString and not std::string?
boud at valdyas.org
Sat Jun 16 17:22:40 CEST 2012
On Saturday 16 June 2012 Jun, Michael Seydl wrote:
> I'd say one reason is the encoding awareness of QString alone is a good reason. Fiddling around with libicu and alike is a mess. Regarding the int to string thing. Who codes C++ without boost nowadays? boost::lexical_cast ftw.
I actually don't know anyone directly who codes C++ _with_ boost.
http://www.valdyas.org, http://www.krita.org, http://www.boudewijnrempt.nl
More information about the Interest