<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Strict//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-strict.dtd"><html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=UTF-8" http-equiv="Content-Type"/>
</head><body style="">
<div>
Hi Nils,
</div>
<div>
</div>
<div>
I reviewed it and am currently running tests under Win XP + 7 and different Linux versions.
<br/>
<br/>All tests should be finished till tomorrow - then the behaviour is checked for up to date
<br/>Windows ans Linux versions (fresh installs with industrial apps for banking/insurance
</div>
<div>
and sortation systems).
</div>
<div>
</div>
<div>
I'll post my test results and comment in the codereview system.
</div>
<div>
</div>
<div>
So hopefully a Troll will accept your commit after multiple devs checked and marked this
</div>
<div>
minor change as proven.
</div>
<div>
</div>
<div>
ciao,
</div>
<div>
Chris
</div>
<div>
</div>
<div>
<br/>> On 8. April 2013 at 10:49 Nils Jeisecke <njeisecke@saltation.de> wrote:
<br/>>
<br/>>
<br/>> Hi List,
<br/>>
<br/>> some time ago I've submitted a fix for a QtSingleApplication problem.
<br/>> The current implementation does not reliably prevent starting multiple
<br/>> instances on Windows .
<br/>>
<br/>> There does not seem to be a maintainer for Qt Solutions. So I'd
<br/>> welcome anyone interested in reviewing this one line change:
<br/>>
<br/>> https://codereview.qt-project.org/#change,44118
<br/>>
<br/>> I've checked this on Mac OS X and Linux and it doesn't show any
<br/>> negative impact there.
<br/>>
<br/>> Best regards
<br/>>
<br/>> Nils
<br/>> _______________________________________________
<br/>> Interest mailing list
<br/>> Interest@qt-project.org
<br/>> http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/interest
</div>
</body></html>