<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body>
<p><br>
</p>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 4/21/21 5:00 AM, Giuseppe D'Angelo
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:mailman.3.1618999201.21544.interest@qt-project.org">
<pre class="moz-quote-pre" wrap="">On your right: witness B, found to be lying multiple times in the past</pre>
</blockquote>
<p>I have never lied in here. Been incorrect at times? Most
assuredly at some point. I have never lied.</p>
<p><a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/lying-definition/">https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/lying-definition/</a></p>
<p>=====<span class="tag"><br>
</span></p>
<p><span class="tag">(L1)</span><span class="sen">
To lie =<sub>df</sub> to make a believed-false statement to
another person with the intention that the other person believe
that
statement to be true.
</span></p>
<p>
L1 is the traditional definition of lying. According to L1, there
are at least four necessary conditions for lying. First, lying
requires
that a person make a statement (statement condition). Second,
**lying
requires that the person believe the statement to be false**; that
is,
lying requires that the statement be untruthful (untruthfulness
condition). Third, lying requires that the untruthful statement be
made
to another person (addressee condition). Fourth, lying requires
that
the person intend that that other person believe the untruthful
statement to be true (intention to deceive the addressee
condition).</p>
<p>=====<br>
</p>
<p>Long ago I came to terms with every Usenet news group or Internet
mailing list comes one troll with a God complex. They have skin
ten thousands of an inch thick and consider everything a personal
insult. For whatever reason, you've chosen to be that here. Fine.</p>
<p>What I can't understand is why the moderators haven't yet put you
on a forced 18+month vacation, especially given all of the emails
coming around off-list.</p>
<p>Here's the thing.</p>
<p>I don't care when Internet trolls call me names or even when they
accuse me of vile physical relationships with blood relatives,
family pets, or farm animals. It's what trolls do. Be on the
Internet long enough and you figure it out. Apparently I have
rather thick skin because I generally don't even notice things
others call personal insults. I don't care when people try to hold
up my code and laugh at it. Very few things I write compile on the
very first attempt. Most certainly they tend to compile and run
incorrectly until I track down the major issues and some of the
minor ones. Generally I'm confident that I have many thousands
(many tens of thousands most likely) of code in devices that are
helping to save lives each and every day. Most of the people who
try to laugh at my code don't have that, and I know this.</p>
<p>None of that bothers me in general. It might irritate at the end
of a particularly long and frustrating day, but in general it's
just gas.</p>
<p>When you made that statement, you jumped with both feet onto the
L Word.</p>
<p><a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/libel">https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/libel</a></p>
<p>You weren't directly responding to a single statement with
something like "That's a lie" stating disbelief. You directly
attacked my professional integrity without citation.</p>
<p>Before you go reaching for the old chestnut of K with no meaning
be advised:</p>
<p>=====<br>
</p>
<p>in Message-ID: <10924316.ADL2evRJuH@tjmaciei-mobl1> Thiago
stated<br>
<br>
The KDE representative to the KDE Free Qt Foundation was also
there and he says he's<br>
the one who tried to retroactively call it "Kool" but it didn't
stick.<br>
<br>
That's the opposite of Linux, where the original author had a
different name<br>
for his project when he first uploaded it and it didn't stick.<br>
</p>
<p>=====</p>
<p>My statements were based on the official
upload/entry/registration. Everybody arguing with me had a passion
for a development code name. They don't appear to have the same
passion when it comes to Windows 10. I don't hear any of them
calling it Redstone, Santorini, Vibranium, etc. <br>
</p>
<p><a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Microsoft_codenames">https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Microsoft_codenames</a></p>
<p>People remember from official release and registration. That's
what people (not me) are writing books about.</p>
<p>Hopefully you aren't going to reach for what Tweedle Dee and
Tweedle Dum discussed with me on dart nights at Two Rivers because
nobody in this list was there.<br>
</p>
<p>Sadly, you did this using your kdab.com email address, thus
exposing them as well.</p>
<p>I guess I can give you until end of day on Monday (locally for me
in the Chicago timezone) to scrounge through the archives and
identify at least two messages from me (you did say multiple) that
meet the Standford definition of a lie. You can't, but I'm willing
to let you try. Keep this in mind:</p>
<p>**lying
requires that the person believe the statement to be false**</p>
<p>__OR__</p>
<p>You can make amends, here, publicly, and go away for a while
whether it is imposed or not.<br>
</p>
<p>Failing that I will have to pursue this via other avenues.</p>
<p>My apologies to everyone else for them having to read this.<br>
</p>
<pre class="moz-signature" cols="72">--
Roland Hughes, President
Logikal Solutions
(630)-205-1593
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://www.theminimumyouneedtoknow.com">http://www.theminimumyouneedtoknow.com</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://www.infiniteexposure.net">http://www.infiniteexposure.net</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://www.johnsmith-book.com">http://www.johnsmith-book.com</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://www.logikalblog.com">http://www.logikalblog.com</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://www.interestingauthors.com/blog">http://www.interestingauthors.com/blog</a></pre>
</body>
</html>