[PySide] Bugzilla closed for new entries
Hugo Parente Lima
hugo.lima at openbossa.org
Wed Mar 21 13:06:21 CET 2012
On Wednesday 21 March 2012 06:05:09 anatoly techtonik wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 10, 2012 at 10:19 AM, anatoly techtonik <techtonik at gmail.com>
> > On Fri, Mar 9, 2012 at 11:56 AM, Matti Airas <matti.p.airas at nokia.com>
> >> On 08.03.2012 19:28, ext anatoly techtonik wrote:
> >>> Well, somebody needs to execute this stuff -
> >>> http://confluence.atlassian.com/display/JIRA/Importing+Data+from+Bugzil
> >>> la
> >>> I'll try to contact tracker list about this.
> >> Neat! Thanks.
> > Done. The letter should appear at
> > http://lists.qt-project.org/pipermail/jeg/ in the March section.
> Good news. JIRA team received the letter and opened an issue (see below).
> There are still some questions:
> 1. Should we import all tickets or those that are open right now?
> 2. If we import all tickets, should we preserve numbering?
Better to import all tickets preserving the numbering, because many of our
unit test are named like test_bugXXX.py, then when we face a regression and
need to do some archaeology it's a just a matter of going to bugzilla and see
the bug comments.
They could ignore bugs with numbers already present on jira, they are really
too old anyway, probably from boost::python time.
> Please add your concerns to the JIRA ticket.
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> Date: Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 10:53 AM
> Subject: RE: [JEG] Import PySide bugs
> To: techtonik at gmail.com, jeg at qt-project.org
> A JIRA issue has been started to track this request.
> Please raise requests to that JIRA project.
> anatoly t.
> PySide mailing list
> PySide at qt-project.org
Hugo Parente Lima
INdT - Instituto Nokia de Tecnologia
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
Url : http://lists.qt-project.org/pipermail/pyside/attachments/20120321/67fe44bd/attachment.bin
More information about the PySide