[Releasing] Testing and verification of Alpha package
thiago.macieira at intel.com
Wed Mar 14 20:20:01 CET 2012
On quarta-feira, 14 de março de 2012 20.05.04, Carsten Munk wrote:
> Isn't it a bit of a regression to just provide one huge tarball in
> this case? It would be much more useful to provide qtbase,
> qtjsbackend, qtdeclarative seperately as tarballs so these can be
> packaged individually?
Agreed. We should provide one tarball per Git repository. There's no need for
a tarball for qt5.git.
The proper process for building should be configure-or-qmake && make && make
install on each package, in succession. Unfortunately, this requires knowing
the build order...
> In addition to that, isn't the -5.0.0 versioning a bit misleading when
> this is just an alpha?
The name "alpha" should appear in the package name. I assume this is an
oversight for now.
Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com
Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center
Intel Sweden AB - Registration Number: 556189-6027
Knarrarnäsgatan 15, 164 40 Kista, Stockholm, Sweden
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 190 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
Url : http://lists.qt-project.org/pipermail/releasing/attachments/20120314/f9f893f7/attachment.bin
More information about the Releasing