[Releasing] Qt 5 alpha 20120314: linux g++ C++11: FAILURE
rohan.mcgovern at nokia.com
Mon Mar 19 00:06:41 CET 2012
Oswald Buddenhagen said:
> On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 01:41:41AM +0100, ext Thiago Macieira wrote:
> > On quinta-feira, 15 de março de 2012 16.58.27, Thiago Macieira wrote:
> > > On quinta-feira, 15 de março de 2012 15.09.30, Oswald Buddenhagen wrote:
> > > > On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 01:16:29PM +0100, ext Thiago Macieira wrote:
> > > > > On quinta-feira, 15 de março de 2012 13.08.38, Thiago Macieira wrote:
> > > > > > ../qt-everywhere-opensource-src-5.0.0/configure -prefix
> > > > > > /tmp/qt-5-alpha-install -release -xcb -opensource -confirm-license
> > > > > > -platform linux-g++-optimised
> > > > >
> > > > > Anyway, there's a new build error. Trailing part of the build log:
> > > > this is a top-level prefix build. this simply doesn't work currently
> > > > (i'm working on that, but it won't be ready for the alpha).
> > > > for the time being, install each module separately.
> > >
> > > Understood.
> > >
> > > What are the build instructions then?
> > Repeating: what are the build instructions then? I can't test the package if I
> > can't build it.
> > I need to install to a prefix, so -prefix $PWD is not an option.
> as i said: install each module separately. qmake -r (configure for
> qtbase), make, make install. lather, rinse, repeat.
> if that doesn't work, we have a problem.
Is there a reason you can't just
... from the top-level?
That builds and installs things in the right order.
That is also how the CI tests builds which require a `make install'.
More information about the Releasing