[Releasing] Qt 5 alpha 20120314: linux g++ C++11: FAILURE
rohan.mcgovern at nokia.com
Mon Mar 19 00:09:10 CET 2012
Thiago Macieira said:
> On sexta-feira, 16 de março de 2012 10.54.44, kai.koehne at nokia.com wrote:
> > >> I'll try that. That's the way I build Qt these days anyway, I was just
> > >> wondering if there was a better / more recommended way.
> > >>
> > >> I also recommend removing the configure and qt.pro from the top-level.
> > >
> > > yes, we probably should do that for the alpha.
> > Huh? Doesn't the top level qt.pro contain the module dependencies? Do we
> > seriously expect people to work them out on their own?
> > Given the choice, I'd rather propose that we only support -developer-build
> > or -prefix="%PWD%/qtbase" in the alpha.
> Neither of those options are acceptable. The package must be installable. We
> must fix installation before releasing the alpha.
> I suggest we remove the files, then add a README that includes the correct
> build order.
As mentioned in another email, doing configure and make install (as
opposed to configure and make and make install) seems to work. Have you
More information about the Releasing