[Ci-reports] fail on ssh://codereview.qt-project.org:29418/qt/qtdeclarative#wip/v4

[Qt Continuous Integration System]

qtdeclarative failed to compile :(

  compiling qml/v4/qv4internalclass.cpp
  qml/v4/qv4internalclass.cpp: In constructor 'QV4::PropertyHashData::PropertyHashData(int)':
  qml/v4/qv4internalclass.cpp:63: error: no matching function for call to 'QBasicAtomicInteger<int>::QBasicAtomicInteger(int)'
  /work/build/qt/qtbase/include/QtCore/../../src/corelib/thread/qbasicatomic.h:132: note: candidates are: QBasicAtomicInteger<int>::QBasicAtomicInteger()
  /work/build/qt/qtbase/include/QtCore/../../src/corelib/thread/qbasicatomic.h:132: note:                 QBasicAtomicInteger<int>::QBasicAtomicInteger(const QBasicAtomicInteger<int>&)
  make[3]: *** [.obj/debug-shared/qv4internalclass.o] Error 1
  make[2]: *** [sub-qml-make_first-ordered] Error 2
  make[1]: *** [sub-src-make_first] Error 2
  make: *** [module-qtdeclarative] Error 2

  Build log: http://testresults.qt-project.org/ci/QtDeclarative_wip_v4_Integration/build_00012/linux-g++-32_developer-build_Ubuntu_10.04_x86/log.txt.gz

  Tested changes (refs/builds/wip/v4_1372320181):
    http://codereview.qt-project.org/59909 [PS2] - Get rid of QHashedV4String
    http://codereview.qt-project.org/59826 [PS2] - Remove a potentially dangerous optimisation
    http://codereview.qt-project.org/59825 [PS2] - Remove the symbol optimisation from hashed string
    http://codereview.qt-project.org/59824 [PS2] - Remove an overoptimisation that was only used (wrongly) in one place
    http://codereview.qt-project.org/59823 [PS2] - More correct assertion in QHasheV4String
    http://codereview.qt-project.org/59822 [PS2] - A frozen class is also sealed
    http://codereview.qt-project.org/59780 [PS2] - Don't use a PersistentValue in QHashedV4String
    http://codereview.qt-project.org/59779 [PS2] - Some optimisations for QV4::Script
    http://codereview.qt-project.org/59778 [PS2] - Speed up QV4::InternalClass
    http://codereview.qt-project.org/59942 [PS1] - Fix an obvious typo in the pool allocation sizing.