[Ci-reports] fail on QtBase_release_Integration #581

Qt Continuous Integration System ci-noreply at qt-project.org
Sat May 10 14:06:41 CEST 2014


Autotest `tst_qthreadpool' failed :(

  Testing tst_QThreadPool
  FAIL!  : tst_QThreadPool::expiryTimeoutRace() 'task.semaphore.tryAcquire(numTasks, 10000)' returned FALSE. ()
  tst_qthreadpool.cpp(384) : failure location
  QtQA::App::TestRunner: Timed out after 450 seconds
  QtQA::App::TestRunner: test failed, running again to see if it is flaky...
  ********* Start testing of tst_QThreadPool *********
  Config: Using QtTest library 5.3.0, Qt 5.3.0
  PASS   : tst_QThreadPool::initTestCase()
  PASS   : tst_QThreadPool::runFunction()
  PASS   : tst_QThreadPool::createThreadRunFunction()
  PASS   : tst_QThreadPool::runMultiple()
  PASS   : tst_QThreadPool::waitcomplete()
  PASS   : tst_QThreadPool::runTask()
  PASS   : tst_QThreadPool::singleton()
  WARNING: tst_QThreadPool::destruction() QTest::qSleep() should have taken 1000000ns, but actually took 190107ns!
  qtestcase.cpp(2889) : failure location
  WARNING: tst_QThreadPool::destruction() QTest::qSleep() should have taken 1000000ns, but actually took 354025ns!
  qtestcase.cpp(2889) : failure location
  WARNING: tst_QThreadPool::destruction() QTest::qSleep() should have taken 1000000ns, but actually took 587923ns!
  qtestcase.cpp(2889) : failure location
  WARNING: tst_QThreadPool::destruction() QTest::qSleep() should have taken 1000000ns, but actually took 807854ns!
  qtestcase.cpp(2889) : failure location
  WARNING: tst_QThreadPool::destruction() QTest::qSleep() should have taken 1000000ns, but actually took 844241ns!
  qtestcase.cpp(2889) : failure location
  WARNING: tst_QThreadPool::destruction() QTest::qSleep() should have taken 1000000ns, but actually took 895784ns!
  qtestcase.cpp(2889) : failure location
  WARNING: tst_QThreadPool::destruction() QTest::qSleep() should have taken 1000000ns, but actually took 874692ns!
  qtestcase.cpp(2889) : failure location
  WARNING: tst_QThreadPool::destruction() QTest::qSleep() should have taken 1000000ns, but actually took 877625ns!
  qtestcase.cpp(2889) : failure location
  WARNING: tst_QThreadPool::destruction() QTest::qSleep() should have taken 1000000ns, but actually took 815955ns!
  qtestcase.cpp(2889) : failure location
  WARNING: tst_QThreadPool::destruction() QTest::qSleep() should have taken 1000000ns, but actually took 883981ns!
  qtestcase.cpp(2889) : failure location
  WARNING: tst_QThreadPool::destruction() QTest::qSleep() should have taken 1000000ns, but actually took 887403ns!
  qtestcase.cpp(2889) : failure location
  WARNING: tst_QThreadPool::destruction() QTest::qSleep() should have taken 1000000ns, but actually took 885517ns!
  qtestcase.cpp(2889) : failure location
  WARNING: tst_QThreadPool::destruction() QTest::qSleep() should have taken 1000000ns, but actually took 857650ns!
  qtestcase.cpp(2889) : failure location
  WARNING: tst_QThreadPool::destruction() QTest::qSleep() should have taken 1000000ns, but actually took 884609ns!
  qtestcase.cpp(2889) : failure location
  WARNING: tst_QThreadPool::destruction() QTest::qSleep() should have taken 1000000ns, but actually took 874203ns!
  qtestcase.cpp(2889) : failure location
  WARNING: tst_QThreadPool::destruction() QTest::qSleep() should have taken 1000000ns, but actually took 876857ns!
  qtestcase.cpp(2889) : failure location
  WARNING: tst_QThreadPool::destruction() QTest::qSleep() should have taken 1000000ns, but actually took 857511ns!
  qtestcase.cpp(2889) : failure location
  WARNING: tst_QThreadPool::destruction() QTest::qSleep() should have taken 1000000ns, but actually took 884958ns!
  qtestcase.cpp(2889) : failure location
  WARNING: tst_QThreadPool::destruction() QTest::qSleep() should have taken 1000000ns, but actually took 785504ns!
  qtestcase.cpp(2889) : failure location
  WARNING: tst_QThreadPool::destruction() QTest::qSleep() should have taken 1000000ns, but actually took 776635ns!
  qtestcase.cpp(2889) : failure location
  WARNING: tst_QThreadPool::destruction() QTest::qSleep() should have taken 1000000ns, but actually took 885098ns!
  qtestcase.cpp(2889) : failure location
  WARNING: tst_QThreadPool::destruction() QTest::qSleep() should have taken 1000000ns, but actually took 897530ns!
  qtestcase.cpp(2889) : failure location
  WARNING: tst_QThreadPool::destruction() QTest::qSleep() should have taken 1000000ns, but actually took 891244ns!
  qtestcase.cpp(2889) : failure location
  PASS   : tst_QThreadPool::destruction()
  PASS   : tst_QThreadPool::threadRecycling()
  PASS   : tst_QThreadPool::expiryTimeout()
  FAIL!  : tst_QThreadPool::expiryTimeoutRace() 'task.semaphore.tryAcquire(numTasks, 10000)' returned FALSE. ()
  tst_qthreadpool.cpp(384) : failure location
  QtQA::App::TestRunner: Timed out after 450 seconds
  QtQA::App::TestRunner: test failure could be reproduced twice consecutively
  QtQA::App::TestRunner: end tst_qthreadpool: 902 seconds, exit code 293

  Build log: http://testresults.qt-project.org/ci/QtBase_release_Integration/build_00581/win32-msvc2010_Windows_7/log.txt.gz

  Tested changes (refs/builds/release_1399718119):
    http://codereview.qt-project.org/85087 [PS3] - Ignore expired certificate during certificate validation



More information about the Ci-reports mailing list