[Ci-reports] fail on QtBase_dev_Integration #5842
Qt Continuous Integration System
ci-noreply at qt-project.org
Tue Feb 17 15:30:11 CET 2015
Autotest `license' failed :(
Build log: http://testresults.qt-project.org/ci/QtBase_dev_Integration/build_05842/revdep-qtdeclarative_linux-g++_developer-build_qtnamespace_qtlibinfix_Ubuntu_14.04_x64/log.txt.gz
Tested changes (refs/builds/dev_1424183200):
http://codereview.qt-project.org/104057 [PS5] - QPair: add noexcept to ctors and assignment operators
http://codereview.qt-project.org/93191 [PS3] - QList: share implementation of operator== with QVector where possible
http://codereview.qt-project.org/93189 [PS3] - QList: share the implementations of contains()/count() with QVector where possible
http://codereview.qt-project.org/96186 [PS2] - QList: prepare for tag dispatching based on memory layout
http://codereview.qt-project.org/96185 [PS5] - tst_QList: test all memory layouts
http://codereview.qt-project.org/106096 [PS1] - QDate: optimize QDate::toString()
http://codereview.qt-project.org/106095 [PS1] - QDateTime: optimize toOffsetString()
http://codereview.qt-project.org/106092 [PS1] - QDateTimePrivate: make bit manipulation code more readable
http://codereview.qt-project.org/106091 [PS1] - QDateTimePrivate: remove pointless comparisons
http://codereview.qt-project.org/106090 [PS1] - QDateTimePrivate: remove pointless copy ctor
http://codereview.qt-project.org/106085 [PS1] - QDateTime: replace out parameters with return-by-value in rfcDateImpl()
http://codereview.qt-project.org/106084 [PS1] - QDateTime: optimize rfcDateImpl()
http://codereview.qt-project.org/106083 [PS2] - QDateTime: change an instance of out parameters to return-by-value
http://codereview.qt-project.org/105398 [PS4] - QTimeZone: don't use QSet, use sorted QList
More information about the Ci-reports
mailing list