[Ci-reports] fail on QtDeclarative_5.5_Integration #117

[Qt Continuous Integration System]

Autotest `tst_qquickmultipointtoucharea' failed :(

The test was determined to be flaky, meaning results were not consistent across multiple runs.  This might make the problem difficult to reproduce.  Also, flaky failures might or might not be related to any recent changes in the source code.

  Testing tst_QQuickMultiPointTouchArea
  FAIL!  : tst_QQuickMultiPointTouchArea::inMouseArea() 'mouseArea->property("pressed").toBool()' returned FALSE. ()
     Loc: [tst_qquickmultipointtoucharea.cpp(882)]
  FAIL!  : tst_QQuickMultiPointTouchArea::mouseAsTouchpoint() Compared values are not the same
     Actual   (touch1rect->property("y").toInt()): 10
     Expected (touch1.y())                       : 20
     Loc: [tst_qquickmultipointtoucharea.cpp(933)]
  FAIL!  : tst_QQuickMultiPointTouchArea::mouseInteraction(left) Compared values are not the same
     Actual   (area->property("touchCount").toInt()): 0
     Expected (accept)                              : 1
     Loc: [tst_qquickmultipointtoucharea.cpp(1188)]
  Totals: 20 passed, 3 failed, 0 skipped, 0 blacklisted
  QtQA::App::TestRunner: test failed, running again to see if it is flaky...
  ********* Start testing of tst_QQuickMultiPointTouchArea *********
  Config: Using QtTest library 5.5.0, Qt 5.5.0 (x86_64-little_endian-lp64 shared (dynamic) release build; by Clang 6.0 (clang-600.0.54) (Apple))
  PASS   : tst_QQuickMultiPointTouchArea::initTestCase()
  PASS   : tst_QQuickMultiPointTouchArea::properties()
  PASS   : tst_QQuickMultiPointTouchArea::signalTest()
  PASS   : tst_QQuickMultiPointTouchArea::release()
  PASS   : tst_QQuickMultiPointTouchArea::reuse()
  PASS   : tst_QQuickMultiPointTouchArea::nonOverlapping()
  PASS   : tst_QQuickMultiPointTouchArea::nested()
  FAIL!  : tst_QQuickMultiPointTouchArea::inFlickable() Compared values are not the same
     Actual   (point11->pressed()): 0
     Expected (true)              : 1
     Loc: [tst_qquickmultipointtoucharea.cpp(633)]
  PASS   : tst_QQuickMultiPointTouchArea::inFlickable2()
  PASS   : tst_QQuickMultiPointTouchArea::inMouseArea()
  PASS   : tst_QQuickMultiPointTouchArea::mouseAsTouchpoint()
  PASS   : tst_QQuickMultiPointTouchArea::invisible()
  PASS   : tst_QQuickMultiPointTouchArea::transformedTouchArea(1st point inside)
  PASS   : tst_QQuickMultiPointTouchArea::transformedTouchArea(2nd point inside)
  PASS   : tst_QQuickMultiPointTouchArea::transformedTouchArea(3rd point inside)
  PASS   : tst_QQuickMultiPointTouchArea::transformedTouchArea(all points inside)
  PASS   : tst_QQuickMultiPointTouchArea::transformedTouchArea(all points outside)
  PASS   : tst_QQuickMultiPointTouchArea::transformedTouchArea(1st and 2nd points inside)
  PASS   : tst_QQuickMultiPointTouchArea::transformedTouchArea(1st and 3rd points inside)
  PASS   : tst_QQuickMultiPointTouchArea::mouseInteraction(left)
  PASS   : tst_QQuickMultiPointTouchArea::mouseInteraction(right)
  PASS   : tst_QQuickMultiPointTouchArea::mouseInteraction(middle)
  PASS   : tst_QQuickMultiPointTouchArea::cleanupTestCase()
  Totals: 22 passed, 1 failed, 0 skipped, 0 blacklisted
  ********* Finished testing of tst_QQuickMultiPointTouchArea *********
  QtQA::App::TestRunner: test failed on first and second attempts, but with different behavior each time:
  QtQA::App::TestRunner:   first attempt:  exited with exit code 3
  QtQA::App::TestRunner:   second attempt: exited with exit code 1
  QtQA::App::TestRunner: the test seems to be flaky, please fix this
  QtQA::App::TestRunner: this flaky test is being treated as a FAIL
  QtQA::App::TestRunner: end tst_qquickmultipointtoucharea: 24 seconds, exit code 1

  Build log: http://testresults.qt.io/ci/QtDeclarative_5.5_Integration/build_00117/macx-clang_developer-build_OSX_10.10/log.txt.gz

  Tested changes (refs/builds/5.5_1426932704):
    http://codereview.qt-project.org/107973 [PS6] - Remove QItemSelection value-type, use Array instead
    http://codereview.qt-project.org/107687 [PS11] - Remove QModelIndexList value type, use Array instead