[Development] proposing Richard Moore as approver

[kenneth.r.christiansen at nokia.com]

Nope, I also think it is a bit too much. I think it is around a week in
the WebKit project

Kenneth

On 02/11/11 11.14, "ext Olivier Goffart" <olivier at woboq.com> wrote:

>On Tuesday 01 November 2011 16:00:30 Peter Hartmann wrote:
>> Hello,
>> 
>> hereby I would like to propose Richard Moore as approver for the Qt
>>project.
>> 
>> Rich has made numerous high-quality commits to the Qt SSL code and knows
>> Qt very well, being a KDE contributor since the very beginning.
>> 
>> Shane Kearns and Martin Petersson second this proposal.
>> 
>> Please raise any concerns you might have about this until 22nd of
>> November 2011 (see the guide lines at
>> 
>>http://wiki.qt-project.org/The_Qt_Governance_Model#How_to_become_an_Appro
>>ver
>> ).
>
>I know it is not needed, but I also recommand Richard as an approver.
>
>But am I alone to think that 3 weeks of waiting time is a lot?
>15 work day is a lot,  how about reducing it to something between 7 and
>10 
>work days?
>
>_______________________________________________
>Development mailing list
>Development at qt-project.org
>http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development