[Development] [cmake-developers] Installing Qt5Config.cmake from the Qt repo?

[Oswald Buddenhagen]

On 11/03/11 19:44, ext Alexander Neundorf wrote:
> On Wednesday 02 November 2011, Oswald Buddenhagen wrote:
>> and neither does foo/bar/libbaz.so.
>
> Why ?
>
it's not abstract. it does in no way refer to the packages it depends on 
in turn. you can only make cumulative command lines.

>> you need abstract dependencies, but that
>> depends on the build/packaging system again.

>>>> then, how do you define "build
>>>> configuration" in a build system agnostic way? zero chance.
>>>
>>> At least for Windows it should be clear. There are debug and non-debug
>>> builds, which are AFAIK relatively clear separated.
>>
>> yes, and release_with_debuginfo, and custom and whatever.
>
> I don't see a problem there.
>
well, i do. lumping together two types of release builds into an 
arbitrary "release" category doesn't really cut it.