[Development] API review for a new QDnsResolver class

[Thiago Macieira]

On Friday, 4 de November de 2011 21:01:30 Andre Somers wrote:
> Me too. My point was, that we have slightly different patters for 
> basically the same sort of thing in different places in Qt. QFuture is 
> currently coupled with QtConcurrent, but is there a strong reason why 
> is must be? I was not privy to that IRC chat, perhaps you could tell us 
> the reasoning why it would not be possible?

There's no reason why it has to be coupled with Concurrent. Or, to put in 
other words, it could be changed to work without Concurrent.

However, the problem is, it is currently too tightly coupled with 
QtConcurrent. Unless someone is volunteering to do this work right now...

-- 
Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com
  Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center
     Intel Sweden AB - Registration Number: 556189-6027
     Knarrarnäsgatan 15, 164 40 Kista, Stockholm, Sweden
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 190 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://lists.qt-project.org/pipermail/development/attachments/20111104/d27b8881/attachment.sig>