[Development] Platform / compiler support
Thiago Macieira
thiago.macieira at intel.com
Mon Nov 7 19:52:37 CET 2011
On Monday, 7 de November de 2011 17:42:22 jan-arve.saether at nokia.com wrote:
> Don't we need to agree on what criteria a platform needs to fulfill in
> order to be supported? The supported platforms will change as times go by,
> so the list will need to be updated by some criteria (it might cause
> discussion when some platforms are removed from the list, or if some are
> favored above others)
>
> * Is the criteria the number of installed platform SDKs?
> * Is the criteria availability of platform SDK for people in the community?
> (e.g. MinGW has wider availability than MSVC) * Is the criteria that it
> should be used for automatic compile tests?
>
> For instance, I'm not sure if Qt will have significant increased adoption
> because ICC is a supported platform, (it would be nice with some numbers,
> maybe a poll would suffice?
For this purpose, since we're talking about what kind of compiler and language
features will be allowed in the source code, we have to be very broad. For
example, suppose we want to allow template-template parameters in the code
without restrictions. That means TTPs may enter into our API.
Now imagine someone wants to port Qt to a platform with a compiler that
doesn't support TTPs. That will be impossible because TTPs are mandatory and
cannot be worked around. So this port is dead before it even starts happening.
This is why I'm recommending being very conservative. Once we allow a feature
unrestrictedly and it enters the API, there's no going back.
--
Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com
Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center
Intel Sweden AB - Registration Number: 556189-6027
Knarrarnäsgatan 15, 164 40 Kista, Stockholm, Sweden
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 190 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://lists.qt-project.org/pipermail/development/attachments/20111107/401bd108/attachment.sig>
More information about the Development
mailing list