[Development] Towards a Qt 5 beta

[techabc]

1. Does the beta will coming in end of this month aka. April ?
2. Is there binary packages with this upcoming beta ?

2012/4/16 Rohan McGovern <rohan.mcgovern at nokia.com>:
> jason.mcdonald at nokia.com said:
>> > Random question of the day: do you happen to have stats about how
>> > often those insignificant tests actually fail? That should help to
>> > figure out which ones are actually working, and therefore should not
>> > be marked as insignificant.
>>
>> I'm glad you asked.  I spent some time yesterday and today doing that analysis for the 40-odd insignificant tests that had no Jira task associated.
>>
>> I used the data from the last eleven CI runs for each module (times eight configs for which autotests are executed).  That's not hugely statistically significant, but it's not that easy to pull large numbers of build logs out of the CI system manually through the web interface.  (Any CI folks who can tell me how to extract/search all the stored logs?)
>
> I'm using this pattern (which has some minor problems not relevant for
> any test I've looked at so far):
>
>  from=02238
>  to=02538
>  prj=QtBase_master_Integration
>  cfg=win32-msvc2010_Windows_7
>  test=tst_QLocale
>  trailing_lines=3
>  for i in $(seq -w $from $to); do
>      echo "$i:"
>      wget --quiet -O - http://testresults.qt-project.org/ci/$prj/build_$i/$cfg/log.txt.gz |
>        zcat |
>        egrep -A $trailing_lines "Testing $test" ||
>        echo "did not run"
>      echo ""
>  done 2>&1 | tee results_${test}.txt
>
> ... and scanning at least one hundred logs.
>
> Having a transparent caching proxy between self and
> testresults.qt-project.org helps a lot.
> _______________________________________________
> Development mailing list
> Development at qt-project.org
> http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development