[Development] state of Qt's Australia office

[Thiago Macieira]

On quinta-feira, 2 de agosto de 2012 15.48.19, a.grandi at gmail.com wrote:
> 2) RIM must patch upstream any improvement and Qt will benefit from this

I'm not sure if you meant "upstream" in the way that I understand it. So let's 
be clear:

Any user of LGPL must make their modifications available to anyone who received 
the binary code, under the LGPL.

They do not have to make the modifications public in a website on the Internet. 
There are other forms. 

They do not have to make them available to someone who did not receive the 
binary forms.

They do not have to upstream them. That is, they don't have to submit them to 
the original project and go through the process of getting it approved.

They should, but they don't *have* to.
-- 
Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com
  Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center
     Intel Sweden AB - Registration Number: 556189-6027
     Knarrarnäsgatan 15, 164 40 Kista, Stockholm, Sweden
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 190 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://lists.qt-project.org/pipermail/development/attachments/20120802/31e926ab/attachment.sig>