[Development] Setting up time-based releases for the project

[Thiago Macieira]

On terça-feira, 7 de agosto de 2012 08.10.22, lars.knoll at nokia.com wrote:
> I agree that we should kickstart the model after the beta release. Branch
> names should be more concrete and for outsiders to understand, so I'm with
> Alan to give then easy to understand names. My proposal would be master,
> beta and stable.

And that's why João used weird names. He wanted us to focus on discussing the 
model, not on what names the branches should have.

My recommendation is that master be one of the two stable branches. That's 
what people cloning from Git should get. In Linux's and Git's own Git 
repositories, master in fact points to the latest released tag.
-- 
Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com
  Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center
     Intel Sweden AB - Registration Number: 556189-6027
     Knarrarnäsgatan 15, 164 40 Kista, Stockholm, Sweden
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 190 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://lists.qt-project.org/pipermail/development/attachments/20120807/2f092af0/attachment.sig>