[Development] Maintainer changes to review: QMutex optimisations

[Thiago Macieira]

On domingo, 26 de agosto de 2012 15.44.11, lars.knoll at nokia.com wrote:
> Which is why I'm asking whether they shouldn't be separate classes sharing
> as much of the implementation as possible.

So the question I need Olivier to answer is:

What are the conditions you envision for casting a QMutex to QBasicMutex?

That said, I don't see the need to break the inheritance. The inheritance, by 
itself, does not constrain the design. The design is currently constrained by 
choice and it could be similarly constrained even if we broke the inheritance.

-- 
Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com
  Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center
     Intel Sweden AB - Registration Number: 556189-6027
     Knarrarnäsgatan 15, 164 40 Kista, Stockholm, Sweden
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 190 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://lists.qt-project.org/pipermail/development/attachments/20120826/d92545bd/attachment.sig>