[Development] RFC: What constitutes a "non-destabilising" bug-fix?

Thiago Macieira thiago.macieira at intel.com
Mon Dec 10 16:48:30 CET 2012

On segunda-feira, 10 de dezembro de 2012 12.07.21, Marc Mutz wrote:
> I was suggesting that bug-fixes initially be submitted for stable (blindly, 
> if you will) and that review decides whether to redirect them to dev
> instead.

If you're a reviewer and you know you'd suggest moving it to dev, then you 
might as well send your own fix to dev in the first place.

As I said in my earlier reply, "use the grey mass" :-)

Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com
  Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 190 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://lists.qt-project.org/pipermail/development/attachments/20121210/cc381d46/attachment.sig>

More information about the Development mailing list