[Development] QML engine C++ class renaming
markg85 at gmail.com
Wed Feb 15 11:12:28 CET 2012
2012/2/15 Thiago Macieira <thiago.macieira at intel.com>
> On quarta-feira, 15 de fevereiro de 2012 09.53.29, aaron.kennedy at nokia.com
> > Hi,
> > On 15/02/2012, at 9:44 AM, ext Thiago Macieira wrote:
> > > How big are the Qt Quick 1 language support classes? I'm asking so we
> > > have an idea of how much maintenance effort those classes will be. I
> > > assume that they will continue to use V8, which will be continually
> > > updated and modified to support Qt Quick 2 and that introduces risk of
> > > regressions and breakages.
> > No. They would literally be copies of the 4.8 classes, so would rely on
> > QtScript and JSC and not V8.
> That's even more work to be maintained. Are we prepared to do that?
> How's the compatibility going so far? If they are using today the V8
> engine, I
> assume you've taken steps to keep compatibility issues limited. Why can't
> keep on using that?
> Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com
> Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center
> Intel Sweden AB - Registration Number: 556189-6027
> Knarrarnäsgatan 15, 164 40 Kista, Stockholm, Sweden
> Development mailing list
> Development at qt-project.org
Just a simple point of view from someone that likes QML and plays with it a
Why would you still support QML 1? Qt5 is going to have QML 2 which should
be superior to QML 1 in about every single way so why not just drop it for
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Development