[Development] QML engine C++ class renaming

[Mark]

2012/2/15 Thiago Macieira <thiago.macieira at intel.com>

> On quarta-feira, 15 de fevereiro de 2012 09.53.29, aaron.kennedy at nokia.com
> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On 15/02/2012, at 9:44 AM, ext Thiago Macieira wrote:
> > > How big are the Qt Quick 1 language support classes? I'm asking so we
> can
> > > have an idea of how much maintenance effort those classes will be. I
> > > assume that they will continue to use V8, which will be continually
> > > updated and modified to support Qt Quick 2 and that introduces risk of
> > > regressions and breakages.
> > No.  They would literally be copies of the 4.8 classes, so would rely on
> > QtScript and JSC and not V8.
>
> That's even more work to be maintained. Are we prepared to do that?
>
> How's the compatibility going so far? If they are using today the V8
> engine, I
> assume you've taken steps to keep compatibility issues limited. Why can't
> we
> keep on using that?
>
> --
> Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com
>  Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center
>     Intel Sweden AB - Registration Number: 556189-6027
>     Knarrarnäsgatan 15, 164 40 Kista, Stockholm, Sweden
>
> _______________________________________________
> Development mailing list
> Development at qt-project.org
> http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
>
>
Just a simple point of view from someone that likes QML and plays with it a
lot.
Why would you still support QML 1? Qt5 is going to have QML 2 which should
be superior to QML 1 in about every single way so why not just drop it for
Qt5?
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.qt-project.org/pipermail/development/attachments/20120215/1ff2c5a2/attachment.html>