[Development] QML engine C++ class renaming

Mark markg85 at gmail.com
Wed Feb 15 11:21:52 CET 2012

On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 11:17 AM, Robin Burchell <robin+qt at viroteck.net>wrote:

> 2012/2/15 Mark <markg85 at gmail.com>:
> > Why would you still support QML 1? Qt5 is going to have QML 2 which
> should
> > be superior to QML 1 in about every single way so why not just drop it
> for
> > Qt5?
> Because one of the central points of Qt 5 is maintaining compatibility
> with Qt 4 as far as is possible. That means not breaking existing code
> (of which there is quite a lot).

I understand, but isn't QML 2 itself backwards compatible with QML 1? All
the dev has to do is change the import line and everything should still
work right?
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.qt-project.org/pipermail/development/attachments/20120215/68b863fb/attachment.html>

More information about the Development mailing list