[Development] Proposal: Remove QML from Qt's code base (OR: Should it be a requirement that Qt Modules are interoperable?)

[Donald Carr]

QML is in either the qtquick1 or qtdeclarative submodule, entirely
outside of qtgui.

Since qtgui is your personal feast, make merry and let your poised
hurricane of commits run down upon us.

w00t
Diatribe Corr

On Wed, Jul 4, 2012 at 12:17 AM, d3fault <d3faultdotxbe at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Jul 3, 2012 10:04 PM, <lorn.potter at nokia.com> wrote:
>>
>> QML was started long before Nokia bought Trolltech.
>>
>> To answer your question, my opinion is No, QML should not be removed.
>>
>
> Lorn, so you think it should be allowed that Qt Modules are not
> interoperable?
>
> Also, did QML in the Trolltech days have javascript hacked on and forced-JIT
> in the design? There's a 3rd option that I intentionally didn't mention that
> is actually a sensible home for QML: .ui file replacement. Currently QML
> depends too much on itself to be a .ui file replacement. There is no C++
> equivalent of much of the functionality in QML, whereas everything you can
> do in a .ui file, you can do in C++.
>
> d3fault
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Development mailing list
> Development at qt-project.org
> http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
>



-- 
-------------------------------
 °v°  Donald Carr
/(_)\ Vaguely Professional Penguin lover
 ^ ^

Cave canem, te necet lingendo
Chasing my own tail; hate to see me leave, love to watch me go
Feeding the trolls is only marginally more rewarding than feeding the
pigeons, and carries the same consequences