[Development] Using Qt 5 with C++11/Clang 3.1?

[Thiago Macieira]

On sexta-feira, 6 de julho de 2012 14.53.56, Stephen Chu wrote:
> I tried Clang 3.1 and it compiles with or without the equal sign.

Then I don't understand. If it supports brace-initialisation for non-PODs, why 
is it complaining about QBasicAtomicInt?

-- 
Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com
  Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center
     Intel Sweden AB - Registration Number: 556189-6027
     Knarrarnäsgatan 15, 164 40 Kista, Stockholm, Sweden
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 190 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://lists.qt-project.org/pipermail/development/attachments/20120706/ad670c91/attachment.sig>