[Development] Using Qt 5 with C++11/Clang 3.1?

[Olivier Goffart]

On Friday 06 July 2012 17:26:13 Stephen Chu wrote:
> On 7/6/12 3:23 PM, Thiago Macieira wrote:
> > On sexta-feira, 6 de julho de 2012 14.53.56, Stephen Chu wrote:
> >> I tried Clang 3.1 and it compiles with or without the equal sign.
> > 
> > Then I don't understand. If it supports brace-initialisation for non-PODs,
> > why is it complaining about QBasicAtomicInt?
> 
> I took the preprocessor output of one of the moc_*.cpp files and find
> that it comes down to something like this:
[...]
> It seems the added constructor is confusing Clang. The same code
> compiles fine with GCC 4.7.

Yes, 

This is the bug http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=12670
I spend my evening doing a patch before I saw that bug report and noticed 
there was already one patch attached.  But I think my patch is better :-)

Anyway, if we want to support that version of clang, this still need to be 
worked around, so I suggest that the problematic code should be #ifdef'd out 
for the 'broken' versions of clang.

-- 
Olivier

Woboq - Qt services and support - http://woboq.com