[Development] Using Qt 5 with C++11/Clang 3.1?

[Thiago Macieira]

On sábado, 7 de julho de 2012 09.36.55, Olivier Goffart wrote:
> On Saturday 07 July 2012 07:33:56 Thiago Macieira wrote:
> > On sábado, 7 de julho de 2012 02.12.42, Olivier Goffart wrote:
> > > Anyway, if we want to support that version of clang, this still need to
> > > be
> > > worked around, so I suggest that the problematic code should be #ifdef'd
> > > out  for the 'broken' versions of clang.
> > 
> > We also need to know which version fixes the bug so we can apply a correct
> > version fix. And the Apple clang version and how to figure out when it is
> > Apple clang.
> > 
> > For now, I'd say we blacklist constexpr in Clang.
> 
> This has nothing to do with constexpr
> It is the aggregate initialisation that has a small bug.

I understand that. But the constructors only exist because we have constexpr. 
If we didn't have it, we wouldn't have added the constructors which would have 
left them as PODs.

-- 
Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com
  Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center
     Intel Sweden AB - Registration Number: 556189-6027
     Knarrarnäsgatan 15, 164 40 Kista, Stockholm, Sweden
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 190 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://lists.qt-project.org/pipermail/development/attachments/20120707/4a168151/attachment.sig>