[Development] Moving QWindowSystemInterface out of QPA
Stephen Kelly
stephen.kelly at kdab.com
Wed Jul 11 16:56:59 CEST 2012
On Wednesday, July 11, 2012 20:00:39 you wrote:
> An alternate approach is to make a header specific to QTestLib which
> ensures that modules privates are not required.
This is very hacky. I prefer to simply move it from qpa/ to the same location
as the rest of the public headers.
However, a solution acceptable for everyone else which achieves the 'modules
privates are not required' goal is acceptable for me too.
> This approach keeps
> QWSI as QPA API and very minor change.
I still don't see what makes it a QPA API, but ok.
> We can call this forwarding
> header QTestLibWindowSystemInterface or something. Comments ? (of
> course, need to have some minor changes to syncqt to not emit warning
> code etc).
>
> https://codereview.qt-project.org/#change,30643
You don't use the name QTestLibWindowSystemInterface in the patch. Is that a
mistake or does it make the patch more complex?
I think we'll just have to hear rationale from the people who want it to be
private before we figure this out.
Thanks,
--
Stephen Kelly <stephen.kelly at kdab.com> | Software Engineer
KDAB (Deutschland) GmbH & Co.KG, a KDAB Group Company
www.kdab.com || Germany +49-30-521325470 || Sweden (HQ) +46-563-540090
KDAB - Qt Experts - Platform-Independent Software Solutions
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://lists.qt-project.org/pipermail/development/attachments/20120711/b14894f3/attachment.sig>
More information about the Development
mailing list