[Development] Abandoning the container changes
Thiago Macieira
thiago.macieira at intel.com
Mon Jul 16 23:52:32 CEST 2012
On segunda-feira, 16 de julho de 2012 21.34.10, André Pönitz wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 05, 2012 at 09:04:39AM +0300, Thiago Macieira wrote:
> > Hello all
> >
> > I think that, despite the potential benefits of the changes, we
> > should not apply them at this time. There are far too many chances
> > for breakage and it's a blatant disrespect for the feature freeze.
>
> I assume this is meant as a verdict, not as (possibly temporary)
> state of thinking.
Correct. The changes are the right thing to do, just not now. We'll have to
live with the current containers and their overhead until Qt 6.
That includes the fact that QList<QVariant> is extremely inefficient.
--
Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com
Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center
Intel Sweden AB - Registration Number: 556189-6027
Knarrarnäsgatan 15, 164 40 Kista, Stockholm, Sweden
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 190 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://lists.qt-project.org/pipermail/development/attachments/20120716/26680c2b/attachment.sig>
More information about the Development
mailing list