[Development] The containers in the "containers" branch

Oswald Buddenhagen oswald.buddenhagen at nokia.com
Tue Jul 31 10:17:53 CEST 2012


On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 09:25:56AM +1000, ext Rohan McGovern wrote:
> It looks to me like the 'containers' branch has been used inconsistently
> with respect to CI, like somebody fast-forwarded it
> from 8141e34280a92088a527e0935765ad8ba8e92be8 to
> 7a0b8d580df8d6b0012d11f61299046682f4d18a rather than putting a merge
> commit through CI.
>
correct. it would be a total waste to re-integrate a fast-forward of a
dead branch.

> Apparently, doing that will not automatically cause
> the staging branch to be updated.
> 
yeah, i always forget. :}

> For future reference, whoever is bypassing the CI to change the SHA1 of
> a branch should also issue a command like this to update the staging
> branch:
> 
>   ssh -p 29418 codereview.qt-project.org gerrit staging-rebuild --project qt/qtbase --branch containers
> 
> , which I have now done, fixing the conflict.
>
that's slight overkill. when you direct-push to a branch with no
activity, you can just direct-push the staging branch as well - you just
edit the command line, replacing heads with staging.



More information about the Development mailing list