[Development] Why we *have to* remove codecFor... ?

[1+1=2]

Yes, MinGW works well, the default input-char-set of which is UTF-8
,no matter whether BOM exists or not.
The behavior is the same as GCC under linux.

Debao

On Thu, Jun 7, 2012 at 12:52 PM, Konstantin Ritt <ritt.ks at gmail.com> wrote:
> #g++ -std=c++0x len.cpp
> #a.exe
>> It's quite good
>
> both gcc-4.4.0 and gcc-4.6.2, MinGW32
>
> Regards,
> Konstantin
>
>
> 2012/6/7 Jürgen Hunold <jhunold at gmx.eu>:
>> Hi Thiago,
>>
>> On Thursday, 7. June 2012 21:27:29 Thiago Macieira wrote:
>>> Anyway, MSVC is now on my list of "crap". I wonder what MinGW is doing on
>>> Windows.
>>>
>>> Can anyone save the (UTF-8 encoded) attached source file and run it? Don't
>>> forget to compile with -std=c++0x.
>>
>> E:\Home\hunold\src\test\utf8>g++ -std=c++0x len.cpp
>> E:\Home\hunold\src\test\utf8>a
>> It's quite good
>>
>> gcc version 4.6.3 20111208 (prerelease) (GCC)
>>
>> This is Mingw-64, using Ruben Van Boxems personal build.
>>
>> Hope this helps,
>>
>> yours,
>>
>> Jürgen
>> --
>> * Dipl.-Math. Jürgen Hunold  !
>> * voice: ++49 4257 300       ! Fährstraße 1
>> * fax  : ++49 4257 300       ! 31609 Balge/Sebbenhausen
>> * jhunold at gmx.eu             !  Germany
>> _______________________________________________
>> Development mailing list
>> Development at qt-project.org
>> http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
> _______________________________________________
> Development mailing list
> Development at qt-project.org
> http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development