[Development] Code of conduct.

Fri Jun 22 20:47:54 CEST 2012

>   Another answer is simple but personally difficult to implement:

>

>   Don't feed the trolls.

I personally like the solution proposed here: http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Don't_feed_the_Troll

                Because the troll feeds on having its name mentioned or by generating debate or ill feeling, many internet users either ignore the troll completely

                or respond with the phrase, "Don't Feed the Troll".

The only improvement is to do a response like this:

"Don't Feed the Troll". For details, see http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Don't_feed_the_Troll

This improvement is needed because many people are still not familiar with Trolling concept.

What do you think? This should be much easier to implement than a full-blown Code of conduct.

Alex Bravo

-----Original Message-----
From: development-bounces+alex.bravo=nokia.com at qt-project.org [mailto:development-bounces+alex.bravo=nokia.com at qt-project.org] On Behalf Of ext Atlant Schmidt
Sent: Friday, June 22, 2012 5:01 AM
To: 'Alexis Menard'; Storm-Olsen Marius (Nokia-MP/Austin)
Cc: thiago.macieira at intel.com; development at qt-project.org
Subject: Re: [Development] Code of conduct.

Alexis:

> I hate to point fingers but reading this made me sad :

>

> http://labs.qt.nokia.com/2012/06/18/qt-5-accessibility-apis/#comments

  That's actually an excellent example of how/why electronic

  discussions often go sour. The basic algorithm is:

    1. Begin discussion about something meaningful.

    2. Person injects entirely off-track but known-to-be

       highly inflammatory comment.

    3. Other persons involved in the discussion react

       reflexively and respond to the inflammation.

    4. Meaningful conversation is forgotten amid the

       flames.

  Here in the United States, our political Right Wing has

  absolutely perfected this method and has effectively brought

  to a stop any online discussions among the Middle and the Left.

  One answer is to ban the trolls, but that always seems draconian.

  Another answer is simple but personally difficult to implement:

  Don't feed the trolls.

  The downside, of course, is that the trolls still take up

  "airtime" and, unresponded to, naïve readers may assume that

  there's no response to the trolls because they "have a point".

  That's what makes it so personally difficult to implement

  the second strategy.

  And of course all this is nothing new; it has been such for

  decades, ever since the first electronic discussion fora

  were formed. But these days, the disruption technique has

  really been perfected.

                                Atlant

-----Original Message-----

From: development-bounces+aschmidt=dekaresearch.com at qt-project.org<mailto:development-bounces+aschmidt=dekaresearch.com at qt-project.org> [mailto:development-bounces+aschmidt=dekaresearch.com at qt-project.org]<mailto:[mailto:development-bounces+aschmidt=dekaresearch.com at qt-project.org]> On Behalf Of Alexis Menard

Sent: Friday, June 22, 2012 6:29 AM

To: marius.storm-olsen at nokia.com<mailto:marius.storm-olsen at nokia.com>

Cc: thiago.macieira at intel.com<mailto:thiago.macieira at intel.com>; development at qt-project.org<mailto:development at qt-project.org>

Subject: Re: [Development] Code of conduct.

On Fri, Jun 22, 2012 at 4:53 AM,  <marius.storm-olsen at nokia.com<mailto:marius.storm-olsen at nokia.com>> wrote:

> Right. I must admit i can't see which specific incident which

> triggered this thread now, i believe the community has behaved good

> lately. But i agree that a general code of conduct for all our forums

> (mails, IRC, reviews, bugreports, etc)

I hate to point fingers but reading this made me sad :

http://labs.qt.nokia.com/2012/06/18/qt-5-accessibility-apis/#comments

>

> So, let's grab one of the existing CoC for KDE, Linux.Conf and/or others, take the best of them and make it our own.

>

> Anyone feel like taking the lead on that, and drive the discussions until a conclusion?

>

> --

> Sent from my Nokia N9

>

> On 6/22/12 1:16 ext Thiago Macieira wrote:

> On sexta-feira, 22 de junho de 2012 08.47.34, Rohan McGovern wrote:

>> Having a code of conduct may anyway be a good thing, but I don't

>> think it would have made a difference to the behavior from

>> non-contributors I think you're referring to in your mail.

>> No matter what you do, jerks will be jerks....

>

> That is true, but like you said it's a good thing. It's something we

> can point to when things start to get heated, even to

> non-contributors. And if we do need to take action, like moderating or

> banning someone from a mailing list, we can point to it and say it was not an arbitrary decision.

>

> I'd like to think that common sense should be enough to guide our

> conduct, but experience shows that common sense is not that common.

> And as the community grows, we might get more and more people with

> different cultures, different viewpoints and who might inadvertently step on other people's toes.

>

> --

> Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com  Software Architect -

> Intel Open Source Technology Center

>     Intel Sweden AB - Registration Number: 556189-6027

>     Knarrarnäsgatan 15, 164 40 Kista, Stockholm, Sweden

> _______________________________________________

> Development mailing list

> Development at qt-project.org<mailto:Development at qt-project.org>

> http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development

--

Alexis Menard (darktears)

Software Engineer

openBossa @ INdT - Instituto Nokia de Tecnologia _______________________________________________

Development mailing list

Development at qt-project.org<mailto:Development at qt-project.org>

http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development

Click https://www.mailcontrol.com/sr/tZs7q5!jSC3TndxI!oX7Us7Qlo!t9IHtzJUV8uV1LUCE1I3QgnPkjW5PWUCnv8VgatMIqsrnApWBj3G9C26e4g==  to report this email as spam.

This e-mail and the information, including any attachments, it contains are intended to be a confidential communication only to the person or entity to whom it is addressed and may contain information that is privileged. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please immediately notify the sender and destroy the original message.

Thank you.

Please consider the environment before printing this email.

_______________________________________________

Development mailing list

Development at qt-project.org<mailto:Development at qt-project.org>

http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.qt-project.org/pipermail/development/attachments/20120622/ace9f5d5/attachment.html>