[Development] Pending decisions on co-installation
Lincoln Ramsay
a1291762 at gmail.com
Thu Nov 1 02:56:25 CET 2012
On 01/11/12 09:41, Thiago Macieira wrote:
> On quinta-feira, 1 de novembro de 2012 09.23.37, Lincoln Ramsay wrote:
>> On 01/11/12 01:02, Thiago Macieira wrote:
>>> Also, do I understand correctly that you're suggesting that multiarch
>>>
>>> distributions should have *both*:
>>> /usr/lib/qt5//bin/assistant AND /usr/lib64/qt5/bin/assistant
>>> /usr/lib/qt5//bin/linguist AND /usr/lib64/qt5/bin/linguist
>>> /usr/lib/qt5//bin/designer AND /usr/lib64/qt5/bin/designer
>> hang on... why shouldn't they have both of those?
>>
>> a 32-bit assistant is different to a 64-bit assistant
> How are they different?
Well for one thing, you can't run the 32-bit one against a 64-bit
install or vice versa. Any plugins they load (including system style
plugins) must be the same bit-ness. Designer used to load plugins for
custom widgets... not sure if it still does.
If you're on a 64-bit distro, you most likely don't want the 32-bit
versions. If you're on a 32-bit distro, you can't use the 64-bit ones.
That's a distro/packaging problem though. The best we could do is to
remove these from the Qt repo and build/packge them separately (like we
do with Creator).
--
Link
More information about the Development
mailing list