[Development] Common base class for all socket types

Joseph Crowell joseph.w.crowell at gmail.com
Tue Nov 6 16:18:20 CET 2012


On 11/6/2012 7:52 PM, d3fault wrote:
> You want to obey a randomly declared 'feature-freeze'
It wasn't randomly declared. :D It has been set in stone since around 
May and is standard practice for open source projects near time for a 
stable release usually starting at the first beta release. Otherwise, a 
stable release would never get done. Don't tell me you don't understand why.

> and decline a
> SUPERIOR re-design that can only take place during BC breakages? It's
> not like it'd be that hard to implement. Sure, we're in a feature
> freeze.... but that's nothing compared to a 'BC promise' that 5 will
> set in stone.
>
> <*insert holy war argument here*>
>
> d3fault
> _______________________________________________
> Development mailing list
> Development at qt-project.org
> http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development




More information about the Development mailing list