[Development] The future of QFuture, and QtConcurrent (was "Is QtConcurrent's code generator still in use?")

[Olivier Goffart]

On Friday 16 November 2012 23:46:32 Tony Van Eerd wrote:
> C++1y (ie whatever the next standard might be called) will likely have even
> more threading options. Including an "executor" model where you queue up
> std::functions to be run on background thread(s).  But the background
> threading is "configurable" by the fact that the executor object isn't
> completely hidden from you (like it is with std::async(), etc).
> 
> Maybe we should model something along those lines.  I've used that model
> quite successfully in the past.
> 
> I can probably find the current proposal(s) in the standards committee if
> anyone is interested.

Are you refering to this one?
http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2012/n3429.pdf


--
Olivier

Woboq - Qt services and support - http://woboq.com