[Development] RFC: banning _q_slot() in favour of new-style connect()?
Olivier Goffart
olivier at woboq.com
Fri Oct 12 10:26:04 CEST 2012
On Thursday 11 October 2012 23:06:18 Thiago Macieira wrote:
> On sexta-feira, 12 de outubro de 2012 07.27.51, Marc Mutz wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I was wondering whether we should stop using the pattern of declaring
> > _q_privateSlots() in favour of connecting to functors or functions
> > directly.
> Makes sense, except that it's of inconvenient use:
> - lambdas: can't use in Qt code
> - functors: inconvenient (need to be out of the class)
> - static member or free functions: will not have access to the target
> object - private member functions: disallowed by Qt coding guidelines
That is indeed a problem: it is not possible to connect to member function of
a QObjectPrivate, only QObject.
One could add an overload (or even a QObjectPrivate::connect) that connect to
a QObjectPrivate function.
>From the implementation point of view it is just a matter of adding a
QPrivateSlotObject inhartiting from QSlotBase.
--
Olivier
Woboq - Qt services and support - http://woboq.com
More information about the Development
mailing list