[Development] New maintainers

Knoll Lars Lars.Knoll at digia.com
Fri Oct 26 11:08:46 CEST 2012

Just did that.


On Oct 26, 2012, at 11:03 AM, Pasion Jerome <Jerome.Pasion at digia.com>

> Hello,
> Can someone update this page?
> http://qt-project.org/wiki/Maintainers
> Cheers,
> Jerome P.
> Documentation Engineer - Digia, Qt 
> ________________________________________
> Fra: development-bounces+jerome.pasion=digia.com at qt-project.org [development-bounces+jerome.pasion=digia.com at qt-project.org] på vegne av Knoll Lars [Lars.Knoll at digia.com]
> Sendt: 26. oktober 2012 10:57
> To: Rodal Samuel
> Cc: <development at qt-project.org>
> Emne: Re: [Development] New maintainers
> On Oct 26, 2012, at 10:33 AM, Samuel Rødal <samuel.rodal at digia.com> wrote:
>> On 09/20/2012 03:54 PM, Thiago Macieira wrote:
>>> On quarta-feira, 19 de setembro de 2012 12.08.14, Knoll Lars wrote:
>>>> Hi,
>>>> I'd like to nominate a couple of new maintainers for some parts of Qt
>>>> currently lacking a maintainer.
>>> Oops, I missed the "I'd like to nominate" part.
>>>> For the kernel subdirectory in Qt Widgets, I'd like to nominate Samuel
>>>> Roedal. He's been working a lot with the QPA infrastructure and implemented
>>>> most of the QWidget/QWindow split.
>>>> For accessibility (across all modules) I'd like to nominate Frederik
>>>> Gladhorn. He's been working a lot with this area over the last years.
>>> I second the nomination for both. Samuel is one of the most dedicated hackers
>>> I know, having taken the time to explain OpenGL concepts to me on several
>>> occasions. Frederik has taken one of the least loved yet extremely important
>>> areas of Qt and run with it for a while. I'd especially like him to be called
>>> a Maintainer for the accessibility so that he can hammer the rest of us when
>>> we break it.
>>> As usual, I'd like to hear from both that they are willing to accept the
>>> rights and responsibilities that come with a maintainership (cf. my other
>>> email, replying to Marc).
>> Thorbjørn notified me that I'd forgotten to respond to this thread. My
>> answer is yes, I would accept the maintainership of the widgets/kernel
>> subdirectory. I spent some time in there already, transitioning the QPA
>> port to Qt 5 by implementing the QWidget back-end in terms of QWindow
>> and QBackingStore.
> Since you already got the support some weeks ago, all that' left to say in this case is:
> Congratulations Samuel!
> Cheers,
> Lars
> _______________________________________________
> Development mailing list
> Development at qt-project.org
> http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development

More information about the Development mailing list