[Development] Co-installation & library naming rules

[Stephen Kelly]

On Friday, September 21, 2012 16:47:11 Thiago Macieira wrote:
> This is long, so I'll give you my recommendation first. If you agree with
> me,  you don't have to read the rest. If you disagree, you have to read my
> arguments.

It seems like the this thread and the 'Qt 5 file hierarchy' are really part of 
the same proposal? It also seems like the proposal is updated a bit (eg for 
Mac). Can you post a combined update if so, so that we can ask distros what 
they think? 

We should find out if the proposal is 'good' to downstreams so that we can 
start moving on it.

Thanks,

-- 
Stephen Kelly <stephen.kelly at kdab.com> | Software Engineer
KDAB (Deutschland) GmbH & Co.KG, a KDAB Group Company
www.kdab.com || Germany +49-30-521325470 || Sweden (HQ) +46-563-540090
KDAB - Qt Experts - Platform-Independent Software Solutions
** Qt Developer Conference: http://qtconference.kdab.com/ **
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://lists.qt-project.org/pipermail/development/attachments/20120928/bc4a8c26/attachment.sig>