[Development] Setting a Minimum Support OpenSSL Version

Raul Metsma raul at innovaatik.ee
Tue Apr 16 20:16:17 CEST 2013


We saw weird behaviours when mixing in our application openssl 1.0.0 and using Security.framework/TokenD.
Using stock openssl resolved this.

Raul

On Apr 16, 2013, at 3:43 PM, Peter Hartmann <phartmann at blackberry.com> wrote:

> On 04/16/2013 01:19 PM, Richard Moore wrote:
>> 2) We could say 1.0.0 is the minimum.
> 
> +1
> 
> This is the de-facto standard already anyhow, at least for me; i.e. I 
> have been acting like "if it works on my PC (1.0.x) and goes through CI 
> (apparently 1.0.x) it is good enough".
> So I am all for noting this down somewhere: 1.0.x is guaranteed to work 
> and fixes for 0.9.x are welcome (just like fixes for the configure 
> option -openssl-linked, which I think is not tested anywhere either).
> 
> Peter
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> This transmission (including any attachments) may contain confidential information, privileged material (including material protected by the solicitor-client or other applicable privileges), or constitute non-public information. Any use of this information by anyone other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you have received this transmission in error, please immediately reply to the sender and delete this information from your system. Use, dissemination, distribution, or reproduction of this transmission by unintended recipients is not authorized and may be unlawful.
> _______________________________________________
> Development mailing list
> Development at qt-project.org
> http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development




More information about the Development mailing list