[Development] New reference platforms in the CI for Qt5.2

qtnext qtnext at gmail.com
Sun Aug 11 12:10:08 CEST 2013


for X64, msvc2012 is fine, but it seems that for XP 32, msvc 2012 is not
possible If I have correctly understand.


2013/8/11 Laszlo Papp <lpapp at kde.org>

>
>
>
> On Sun, Aug 11, 2013 at 1:06 AM, Charley Bay <charleyb123 at gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> Tony sayeth:
>>
>>> <snip>,
>>>
>>> We'd like to change the reference platforms a bit. We have new platforms
>>> coming in and old ones are just that.old.
>>>
>>
>>
>>> <snip>,
>>>
>>> These changes would be targeted for Qt 5.2 and the current proposition
>>> can be seen here:
>>>
>>> http://qt-project.org/wiki/CI_Configurations
>>>
>>> (That web page has been badly out of date, but I'm automating the update
>>> process of it currently.
>>> I will also keep the Qt argument list up to date so that you can see
>>> what the differences are between the configurations.)
>>> <snip>,
>>
>>
>> This is a helpful page -- thanks!
>>
>> QUESTION:  I see MSVC2012 start to show up for Win8 (only), and Win7
>> mostly stays with MSVC2010.
>>
>> Because Microsoft is pushing updates for their MSVC2012 (they are no
>> longer updating MSVC2010, and it misses much C++11), our impression is that
>> MSVC2010 is like "Vista", where it's just easier to "move-along" to the
>> next version.  However, we will be Win7 for the foreseeable future (we have
>> no current efforts investigating Win8).
>>
>> Thus, our (Windows) "reference" platforms are MSVC2008 and MSVC2012 (we
>> have no interest in 2010).  Are other people doing this too?  Is there
>> interest in moving to MSVC2012 at the expense of MSVC2010?
>>
>
> A few months ago, we moved from 2008 to 2010 because we were using Qt4 for
> that project, and there were no official 2012 packages. I do not work
> anymore in that project, but the plan was to move to 2012 once the Qt 4 to
> 5 migration would take place.
>
> My impression is, and experience for that matter, a 2010 to 2012 change is
> a common ongoing practice for Qt 5 customers. I have not seen many people
> using 2008 with Qt 5.
>
> -- Laszlo
>
>
>
>
>>
>> --charley
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Development mailing list
>> Development at qt-project.org
>> http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Development mailing list
> Development at qt-project.org
> http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.qt-project.org/pipermail/development/attachments/20130811/a44101c2/attachment.html>


More information about the Development mailing list