[Development] Proposal for allowing handling of HTTP redirects in QNAM

Mandeep Sandhu mandeepsandhu.chd at gmail.com
Thu Dec 26 13:45:56 CET 2013

>> Your thoughts?
> The download progress signal will have to be emitted for the
> intermediate requests. Things like operation() and url() are stored in
> the request object which can't be changed by the QNAM at all. If
> people want all the details then they must implement their own
> redirection support. The built in support can only cover the simple
> cases.

We could emit download progress for each intermediate request, but
won't that look strange to a user as the bytes received & _possibly_
bytes total values will keep changing across these requests? Or is
that acceptable given the user knows that we're making multiple
requests on its behalf?


More information about the Development mailing list