[Development] Proposal for allowing handling of HTTP redirects in QNAM

Mandeep Sandhu mandeepsandhu.chd at gmail.com
Thu Dec 26 13:45:56 CET 2013


>> Your thoughts?
>
> The download progress signal will have to be emitted for the
> intermediate requests. Things like operation() and url() are stored in
> the request object which can't be changed by the QNAM at all. If
> people want all the details then they must implement their own
> redirection support. The built in support can only cover the simple
> cases.

We could emit download progress for each intermediate request, but
won't that look strange to a user as the bytes received & _possibly_
bytes total values will keep changing across these requests? Or is
that acceptable given the user knows that we're making multiple
requests on its behalf?

-mandeep



More information about the Development mailing list